Sunday, April 26, 2026

Not Interested In Conspiracy Theorists

I realized they would get riled up over the post where I went on about Jack Parsons, et al., but I’m not giving any of that a platform, don't want to see any comments with links or wordfloods about vaccines, save it for your therapist.

The reason I went through a phase where I was interested in occultism, fringe religions, conspiracies, the paranormal, et al., was because I have a lifelong obsession with bullshit detection and I didn’t want some conspiracy creep trying to one-up me with their alleged hidden knowledge. As a result I know a lot more about mystery cults, Masonic initiations, etc. than a lot of other people. But it wasn't an ongoing thing. 

It led me toward an obsession with law, and with the kind of evidence that stands up in court. Some of my friends from back then went to the dark side and are making their own conspiracy videos, and probably making bank ripping people off. There are plenty of gullible customers in the sea. That’s not where I went; I was more like “a lot of money would change hands if these conspiracies were true so why isn’t that happening?” 

And then I got old and boring, and decided actually learning about evidence and proof was more interesting than obsessing about other people having parties that I’m not invited to, and … I just sort of dropped out of the Mysterious Knowledge circuit. I had the answers I needed and all that X-Files type drama just got stale and cringey as new generations mutated it, and then the internet was invented, making fact-checking much easier for those who seek it. Most people don’t. 

In fact, I’m getting cynical enough to believe that most people would rather stab their best friend over an unconformed rumor than confirm it, but maybe that’s just the people I’ve been around. Conspiracy theorists are the kind of people who do lots of uncompensated PR legwork for unconfirmed rumor.  Hoping maybe then the popular kids will like them. 

I’m not going to platform that junk, or respond to it, or “debate” it, because you can’t debate with people who live in their own little postmodern bubble where they get to make up all their own facts and decide what they feel “truth” is, all you can do is smile and wave goodbye as they head off to their next adventure. 

Review: Kaiju Agonistes by Scott Lynch

 “Do you, uh, really think we can convince the Americans that Marxism-Leninism might have a live dinosaur on its payroll?”

It’s really an alien intelligence slash kaiju that goes by the name of Messenger, and it’s wreaking havoc on this alternative history tale in which it eats Bob Hope on the way to a USO show in South Korea. (Okay, I snickered.) Things just keep getting juicier, until 

“At the next World Science Fiction Convention (in Cleveland), Harlan Ellison is arrested for punching Robert Heinlein, who is arrested in turn for knocking Harlan unconscious with a large bag of jelly beans. Nobody pays any attention. That night, Messenger knocks the Golden Gate Bridge into San Francisco Bay.”

Would totally pay to see Heinlein show Ellison how to grok in fullness with jelly beans. I hope Connie Willis was there to draw a dick on his face while he was out cold. A red one. 

Finally we make it into the Nixon administration, in which Messenger finally starts talking. It demands everyone embrace the ‘60s-esque philosophy about which John Lennon sneered “we’d all love to see your plan.” 

Then a smart woman steps up to talk to Messenger, and harnesses it to capitalism, and there’s a Nixon mea culpa in there, and I kind of spaced out, because Watergate happened when I wasn’t even dealing with puberty yet, and I didn’t particularly feel like refreshing my memory with regard to late 1900s history just so I can catch all the hyper-detailed Boomer-era references. 

Yup, you guessed it, this is a story for my parents’ generation, not mine. Even if it does have one excellent sentence, speaking as someone who instantly took such a strong dislike to Ellison (from Boy And His Dog) that I refused to ever buy anything involving him and only read his compilations from libraries or used book stores. Guess you could say he inspired me vis-à-vis political outrage. 

And there’s that word again, “political.” I’ve spent the last week looking at memes about how fact-checkers are evil and every bit as bad as Epstein … and I’m a professional fact-checker. And I kept looking at it thinking about how I didn’t block all those family members who got suckered into voting for that pedo so I could stand on the same side with people who despise me for what I innately am (a fact-checker -- plus it’s my career, my hobby, and my passion). 

I have spent a good many years participating in the legal system from an angle that encourages fairness and Universal Healthcare, and discourages institutional discrimination, and the healthcare system we have now. I’m within a degree or two of acquaintance-separation from a lot of liberal politicians due to my work, which is why I don’t talk about it. 

I really think Universal Healthcare could solve a lot of our problems, but I also don’t think we’re going to get it until a smaller share of our population derives outrage with regard to brown people getting free stuff. We have a lot of those people in our country. I don’t agree with them, and that’s why I’m over here where assholes spit on me for being a fact-checker, and frequently try to paint me as some kind of right wing conservative for disagreeing with them about things like pop music and whether ‘60s utopianism is too sacred to criticize (and Harlan Ellison, him too). Both sides of the culture war have plenty of assholes, and I tend to clash with assholes because of that fact-checker thing, so I’m going to run into it either way, but at least this side has the music, so that’s where I’m at politically: pro-music, especially if it’s diverse music and not the shitty kind that’s mostly white people who dislike dancing, and pro-Universal Healthcare, and anti-people who dislike brown people, as well as people whose skin is other colors which are neither white nor comparable to food. 

With regard to the ‘60s utopianism, parts of it were great and parts split off into directions like anti-vaxxerism, because it wasn’t centralized, and full of visions about each individual ruling their own universe (and I’m not going to go off on that tangent like I did with Jack Parsons and Scientology again). 

I used to date this guy who was into Buddhism and he was always dragging me to classes and lectures. There was one where the speaker, a monk with lots of credentials in studying this sort of thing, was discussing symbolism in an ancient tapestry which had animals representing vices. One was a pig, which made me think of Nine Inch Nails songs about all the pigs lined up to face their dystopian ending. So I asked why the pig was there.

The lecturer said that it was because the pig consumes everything indiscriminately. Because of that, it will thrive under degrading conditions without objecting. Unlike other creatures like horses and chickens, which require competent husbandry if they’re going to thrive. In his culture, pigs weren’t so much the fat greedy hoarders that they are in Western mythology as much as ultra-complacent consumers, willing to live in shit and eat garbage. Therefore, in order to avoid the vice symbolized by pigs, one should be selective about what one eats, and reads, and wallows in. 

At the time I wasn’t buying it; the information age had just started and I was wallowing in information. In retrospect, yes, lots of that information was really awful. But the information age grew expansive enough to accept misinformation, half-truths and things you really wish were true and maybe if you wish hard enoug they’ll happen. And lots of us, including myself, turned into pigs, happily wallowing in whatever Facebook and Instagram and Reddit had to offer. 

Like the whole sixties utopian thing. Parts of it are gold. Not being a bigot. Letting everyone see a doctor. More trains; less billionaire jets. Other parts got compromised, like the organics movement moving into anti-vaxxer territory, and some of it was built on bad foundation, like the Freudian references that constantly surface even though modern science is fully aware that things like schizophrenia and autism are not caused by incorrect toilet training. I’m not a pig, and there are quite a few items in this trough that disagree with my digestion.

And that means I can be a liberal while still disagreeing with other liberals. Such as Harlan “Public Sexual Assault” Ellison, for one. He’s adequate nutrition for some, and others even find him umami, and he might even taste like pumpkin pie to a select few. 

If you’re a liberal who was into politics during the late 20th century, you’ll probably get a lot more out of this story than I did. It reminded me of Godzilla Minus One, a film I thought was wonderful, even though I’ve turned into a very picky eater with regard to films as well as books (and friends, and internet memes). 

Read it here. 


Saturday, April 25, 2026

I Have No Opinion On The Best Series Hugo Other Than Let’s Talk About Dungeon Crawler Carl

I have read a total of one book from all the nominated series, which would be John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War. Which is about senior citizens agreeing to go fight a war in exchange for spiffy new bodies. I read one, went “meh, I dislike body swap stories because they reinforce the cultural lie that mind exists separate and apart from the flesh when in fact they are inextricably interwined. Although I understand actors love them because then they get to do scenes like Gabrielle-in-Xena’s-body.“

Bodyswapping is right up there with psionics on my personal list of “science fiction tropes that convince me to close the book unless it’s done in the name of humor.” I got exposed to too much Jack L. Chalker during my formative phase of science fiction. Not interested. 

And the Dungeon Crawler Carl series is full of horrible things being done in the name of humor, with body swapping one of the least unpleasant options. I’ve been in love with this series after picking it up for an airplane flight. It swiftly made the extremely short list of books that have gotten me to laugh out loud on a plane so the other travelers think I’m a lunatic. Right up there with Robert Sheckley. Thanks a lot, Matt Dinniman. 

I had no clue previously that LitRPG was even a thing, but now I’m seriously thinking about trying to write it, after I get done with my trial novel, unless I just decide to write trial novels forever, since that’s a smaller field where it’s much easier to monopolize all the awards, especially if my trial novels are also funny. 

The Carl series takes place inside a game. Evil aliens come to Earth, kill most of us, and put the rest in a Live Action Roleplaying Game which is disgustingly bloody, as well as a very profitable stream. Our hero, Carl, makes it past the initial extinction event with his ex-girlfriend’s cat, Princess Donut. Who soon becomes sentient, and reveals herself to be a formidable player character, with magic missiles and a high charisma score. 

There are seven books so far, with eight coming out in a couple weeks, documenting Carl’s progression to deeper levels of the dungeon, and the dangers found therein, and the amazing loot one can win for persevering. Carl is a steadfast bloke whose motto is “You Will Not Break Me” and in my mind, he looks kind of like young Bruce Campbell in the Evil Dead series, which is a good approximation of the humor/violence threshhold setting in the Carl books. And since Carl is a blue-collar guy with a knack for explosives, his point of view has lots of info dumps about how the trains work, contrasted with fleeting flashes of character development that fester into emotional gut punches later on in the journey. 

There’s currently a Kickstarter happening for a RPG (and also a Card G) based on the Carl-verse, and I’m awfully close to investing in that, and even finding myself a group of deviant humans to game with once it’s launched, even though I haven’t done a childish silly thing like join a RPG campaign in ages. In the meantime, these guys have more fan art available than BTS and Phish combined, with an extraordinary creative out put that includes sculpture, all kinds of visual art, fanfic, posters, t-shirts, and something very near and dear to my heart: jacket patches.

Which feature heavily as a plot point in DC Carl, since Dinniman is a metal guy (and a fellow bass player), so at a certain point Carl gets equipped with a literal battle jacket. 

(I’m an old lady so I have a @ConcertCommandoCoat instead that includes multigenres in addition to punk metal, such as K-Pop and Hawaiian, but once I went over 100 patches I gave it an Instagram of its own.)

Carl’s saga, which follows the Campbell scheme nicely and will remind some readers of the Odyssey and similar, is told in an inelegant everybro style that will probably make many Hugo voters grind their teeth. Packed full of gamer jargon to reflect its original genre. Not afraid to go for the gross jokes. The style is a mixed bag, written at a furious pace, with cringey cliches rubbing elbows with quotes that take up residence in your daily vocabulary. Multiple emotions are evoked. Plus there’s a convoluted-ass plot like no other, with multiple factions and interests, and story arcs that take hundreds of pages to resolve. 

I am in awe, plus I am envious, and even more, I am amazed at how this dude managed to write so good that he parlayed a fanfic from a genre nobody’s ever heard of into a TV deal, vast amounts of merch, a fanfollowing that has thrown over $6m (at this point) at his $250k Kickstarter which has multiple VIP tiers, anyway. It’s all deserved. This is some good shit, fellow word addicts. 

I’m not sure the Hugo base is ready for it though. While Carl does not violate a single one of our hallowed precepts of wokeness, with abundant representation for all, including Mongolians, Icelandics (is that the right word?) and sentient fish, and a political plot that actually succeeds in uniting maga and liberal fans against the evil corporate scumbags controlling this dystopia and their bootlicking AI, there’s some gross childish humor. Dick jokes. Poop jokes. Gory viscera jokes. Hell, the jokes never stop coming, and some of them probably shouldn’t be read while you are taking a sip of your beverage. 

So yeah, Best Series is yet one of the categories I’m avoiding. Along with the editor/artist/podcast type stuff. Maybe I’ll check out the fan things, and I also note with dismay that I own one of the YA nominees (the latest Hunger Games) so I guess I might as well read them all.

After Carl. Immediately after my first reading of the Carl series I turned right around to read it AGAIN, because I love it that much. I haven’t done that with a book since probably Watership Down or something ancient like that, where you go “whoa, what did I just read???” And dive right back in because you’re not ready for the mundane world yet. 


Friday, April 24, 2026

Review: Related Work: The Cuddled Little Vice (Sandman) by Elizabeth Sandifer

This gets my vote for Related Work, although the piece about Octavia Butler may change my mind. And it was a surprise. Not the fact that a Neil Gaiman expose made it onto Related Works, but the fact that this one goes a little deeper, exploring his roots in Scientology, and Scientology’s roots in Thelema via Jack Parsons. And Scientology goes back with Worldcon too, and the Hugos. 

I was involved with Thelema, once upon a time, and I was romantically involved with Jim Graeb for a few years, and he was the attorney who incorporated the OTO, as well as a high-ranking member, and he was also a good friend of Helen Parsons Smith, Jack’s widow. So I know a few things that I’m not likely to repeat, about Jack Parsons and that whole scene, and I’ve watched Jack’s rep evolve over the years, to the point where Breaking Bad is throwing in an overblown Parsons reference as dramatic punctuation, and Jack himself is viewed as some kind of playboy sorceror stud in between classified rocket launches. 

That was during my paranormal exploration phase, in which I was checking out fringe religions and haunted houses, endeavoring to confirm my belief none of that stuff is real. Which I did (for the most part), but I also met lots of wacky and entertaining people, who were quite real. And I will note that while Jack Parsons was also quite real, he was a saint compared to his acolyte L. Ron, who had access to the same kind of knowledge but used it for accumulating money and power, while Parsons was more of a true believer in the core philosophy about doing what thou wilt, and about transitioning into the age of the individual (happened very recently, according to the astrology). 

During that time I was juggling three or more lives. I was working downtown as a legal secretary/slash computer wrangler, and pretending to be a boring nerd, and then at night I was doing my creative thing which involved working on unfinished novels and playing forgettable music, and writing silly features for the alternative press – best-ofs, reviews, and a quirky astrology column. I certainly knew enough about that sort of thing from hanging around with people like Helen Parsons Smith, and Jim, both of whom I have now outlived. That was life number three, hanging around with Jim and his friends, who were an eclectic circle of Northern California occultists, neopagans, philosophers, queers, stoners, artists, writers, and weirdos (some of us were multiple categories) (these days you could probably just say “neurodivergents”). 

I remember one time some bright-eyed co-writer at the alternative paper tried to sneak into my business on a weekend when I was headed to spend a weekend taking acid in the woods with some of that crew. Fritz Leiber showed up that time. And I had to exert myself somewhat in making excuses because she was barely out of college and new to San Francisco, and there was no way I was going to turn her loose in that crowd with psychedelics involved. Several years later someone linked me an article she had written – all about the scary individual known as Jack Parsons! I guess eventually she found out, but I’m glad I didn’t have to help. 

Neil Gaiman was quite popular in those circles too, especially Good Omens, which was a parody of the Satanic Panic style theology that was popular back then, and my whole reason for wanting to investigate the occultists. Were they really skulking around doing evil shit, and hiding evidence of psionics and UFOs from the government? 

Nah, just a bunch of nerds that weren’t completely heterosexual who liked getting high on weed and psychedelics. I didn’t see much actual evil. I saw one pedophile and he got thrown in prison immediately after that fact came to light. The occult people I hung out with were brutal with regard to exiling people such as pedophiles, heroin addicts, large scale dealers, perpetrators of cruelty to animals, and anyone else who might possibly bring the authorities into their sex and drug scene. 

There were other crowds where things were different, such as Marion Zimmer Bradley’s clique in the Oakland Hills, where bad things happened to kids. 

Everyone was part of this big sprawling counterculture hippie scene, trying to get rich in this better future everyone was supposedly creating. Looking at the one they wound up building, I’d say they needed a few more project managers. If you were in the Bay Area, and smart, you wound up in this scene at some level, whether as a gamer or a commie or a musician, a pothead, a queer, a person with an extra convoluted brain. Lots of things came out of this scene, like techies, and Deadheads, and lava lamps. All of them certain we’d be building statues of their visionary asses as we enjoyed all-you-can-eat socialist hippie utopia in the age of Aquarius. 

But instead, they handed the reins to a bunch of sociopaths like L. Ron Hubbard and Jeffrey Epstein, and here we are, all collectively tossing our retirement savings in the hat so a bunch of ugly old men with too much money can go to parties with lots of cocaine and sex, like we were doing back in the day, except the  men were attractive enough so they didn't have to blackmail/coerce people to get laid. And everyone else has to do a GoFundMe to get medical care. 

I digress. Cough. We were talking about Neil Gaiman, and this post is specifically about him and his upbringing and belief structure. Which is covered extensively along with his work, and a chronology of his rather disgusting sexual assaults. 

I’ve only read two of Gaman’s books, both of them gifts from someone else. First there was Good Omens, which someone gave Jim, and I read it to him on a long car trip, because that was how we used to entertain each other when we weren’t doing cocaine sex magick orgies. We also played a lot of chess, and tinkered with computers. If there was one thing I saw plenty of during my occult escapades it was nerds doing nerd things. We would pass along books, especially if we noticed in jokes, and Good Omens was like that. A rollicking story of kids having a Goonies type adventure (that was Pratchett’s part, according to this piece) and a cynical tale about the demon Crowley and the angel Aziraphale, which was Gaiman’s contribution, chock full of occultist in jokes.

After I’d been with Jim a few years we parted and headed in separate directions, because I was about to hit thirty and wanted to try for kids, just not with him. The guy I tried with happened to be carrying a copy of Good Omens around at a party and that was the main reason I talked to him. Turned out he hadn’t read it, someone else had just given it to him. We ended up getting married, although the kid thing didn’t work out, which was a good thing because neither did the marriage. 

Someone else ended up giving me another Neil Gaiman book though, a paralegal at the law firm where I was working. He was probably trying for the “let me blow your mind with this shocking occulty novel in which pagan gods come to life, nerd woman!” kind of angle without realizing I’d been out of that phase for at least a decade but yeah, I was well aware of different pantheons, like any good gamer nerd with a side helping of goth. 

And I did not like the book – American Gods – because it had that same kind of bleak nihilistic coating as the dude in Good Omens, except the decay was more pronounced, and that happens a lot with occultists. Some, like for instance Helen Parsons Smith, manage to hang onto their marbles well into their twilight years, while others turn predatory, like Hubbard, and Gaiman, and seek increasing levels of debauch. 

I ended up returning the American Gods book gift with one about human zoos – specifically, a bunch of Native Americans who lived as performers and zoo inhabitants in Paris, doing wild west shows on the weekend and raising their families in enclosures where tourists would pay to gawk. Human zoos really were a thing back in the day, and I remember my mind being absolutely blown by that knowledge. I will see your tale of bleak nihilism, sir, and raise you one existentialist horror. 

American neo-religions come out of both man’s endless desire for knowledge and man’s endless craving for wealth, and religion creation is a longstanding industry here, with occasional cults like the Mormons and the 7th Day Adventists hitting the jackpot. Crowley, who was a forward-thinker (that’s what I liked about him among his less admirable qualities), set about analyzing all these religions in an attempt to create his very own (with blackjack and hookers) and his disciples continue in that tradition to this day. 

And it does leave a mark on their artistic work that folks accustomed to the jargon will notice (fnord), having a passing familiarity with the same body of work. As Crowley once said, “our method is science, our aim is religion.” His aim with Thelema was to create something a little more user friendly, with less sexism, while retaining all the ceremonies and myths. But rather than following his religion, most of his disciples prefer to try starting their own.  With varying levels of success. 

Gaiman probably would have had a good shot at being a cult leader, given the body of mythology he was creating. I really appreciated this overview of his work, and since none of the other Related Works are calling to me, it gets my vote. I’ve seen way too much gee-whiz lionization of Old Mercury Fulminate breath over the last couple decades, it’s high time people put down the Great Man pipe and spent some time learning about the ecosystem around him and how it influenced a lot of today’s weirdness. 

If you ask me for exciting stories of demons and paranormal manifestations and summonings andspells, I’m going to give you a blank look. Didn’t happen. No time travel. No aliens. No sacrifices aside from a lot of doobies, and one time  people killed a chicken, and then cooked it, and ate it. All the other animals were treated like spoiled pets. I saw lots of dudes reading books, and sometimes we threw wild parties where people got high and sometimes fucked each other. 

I saw lots of people desperate to learn occult secrets and get admitted to the high ranks of the illumnati so they could go spy on the rich dudes at the Bohemian Grove and learn all the secrets about psionics and space aliens. They tend to get pissy when their fantasies don’t pan out and they learned it was mostly a book group for smart misfits.  I’ve met way more felons working in law firms than I ever did hanging around with occultists. I can’t even say that their belief systems are necessarily that bad, since there are plenty of them involved in nicer activities, like helping people use creative visualization and meditation techniques to help with pain control. 

You can tell a lot about a culture by what knowledge it considers worth hiding – occultism just means knowledge that is hidden, often because it’s dangerous but sometimes just because it’s foreign or clashes with the dominant religion. The occultism that informed Parsons, Crowley, and Gaiman holds that religion is something created by humans, and you can create one too, because it’s not like lightning’s going to strike you. 

Some people use that knowledge in creative ways, like the performance I saw last weekend with Trent Reznor yowling “God is dead and no one cares” at the top of his lungs while putting on a banger of a concert. Sometimes people need a strong shot of anti-religion to help pry their brains loose from captivity.

And some are like Neil, and would rather be one of those bastards making a strong cathartic reaction necessary. What a feeble excuse for a person, and what an illuminating examination of his background. 

Here’s a link.


Review: Wire Mother by Isabel J. Kim

Winner winner chicken dinner. 

Cassie lives in a world which is 2/3 digital people. She is afflicted with “Emotional Contagion Disorder … a condition with no ascribed cause, but scientists suspect that it has something to do with mirror neurons. Autism adjacent. The brain generating a reverse pareidolia, in that Cassie keeps abstracting noise from the meaning. Like most neurodivergences, it was only diagnosed when the condition became aggravating to those around her, which, in Cassie’s case, was when she stopped listening to her mother and began saying that she wasn’t real.”

Cassie’s mom is real, but she’s digital, because her dad likes HD RealDoll action more than the analog kind, and Cassie is a moody adolescent. She has a creepy boyfriend who torments small AIs, and apologizes for confusing her with a sex bot when she gets angry after he gets handsy.  She’s Judy Jetson but fucked up, and I adore her and would totally go see the movie made about this. I am at least 75% compatible with this story. 

Isabel J. Kim is a delightful author, I recall reading her stories before and she already has a bunch of trophies under her belt. Which shouldn’t prevent her from earning more. 

Go read this one, it’s fun. 


Review: Six People to Revise You by J.R. Dawson

 A story about someone who is trans and desires to get “revised” which is some kind of medical procedure where they get born again or memory wiped or body swapped or something, it wasn’t clear and I didn’t like the story enough to demand precise answers. Lots of memory flashbacks of romantic exchanges. I kept having to drag my attention back to it, although I am grateful that I finally got around to ordering those office chair arm pads. If this story was playing on my mental mixing board I’d probably turn the faders way down for past anecdotes and way up for “how exactly does this revision science or technology or whatever it is work?” I’m only 22% compatible with this story because the medical framing at the beginning and end seemed realistic but the rest didn’t register very hard. 

One link to inform you, or entertain you, or something. 


Review: “Missing Helen” by Tia Tashiro

 Hmm, a story about a clone … so there’s this relationship between a woman who donated her DNA when she was a broke kid and a scoundrel, and they break up, then the scoundrel gets on Future Tinder to find a new girlfriend, and it matches him with her clone. 

“The app informed him that they were ninety-seven percent compatible.”

 This story is a cop-out, a cock-tease, a rip-off, for not elaborating further about this miraculous compatibility app. Is it like the one in The Sims that balances personalities and interests? Does it work off of astrology, or palmistry, or do you have to fill out a questionnaire with at least 100 questions (in order to achieve a score of 97%)? Or is the compatibility estimate based on biology? Like the implied GSA happening toward the end of the story (don’t google that until you finish reading it, it’s a spoiler)? Does one have better than 97% compatibility with one’s clone? Will we someday just go around in echo chambers made up of our own clones?

The story never answers these questions. It just kind of flops around ideas like “my clone is me, but without the baggage!” And kind of implies that of course men would want to keep trading in their current wife for a younger model of the same person. Or maybe they’re just trying to hit 98% and beat their high score. I was only about 57% compatible with this story but that still exceeds the 42% for the alternate timelines one while not surpassing the 64% I’ll score for the super-abled one. People whose compatibility score is 30% or less with me may have different opinions but it’s not like I’m going to have to spend any time listening to them go on about it. 


Test your compatibility score with this story here.